Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Here are a few highlights I thought were interesting:
1. Cities are updating their infrastructures to make them smarter. The article tells many stories about this but one in particular is about how London has been taking its centuries-old water system and making it smart but implementing sensors that report water flow, leaks, etc. This has allowed the city to save on water and they can now respond more quickly to main breaks.
2. Boulder Colorado is the home to what is considered the world's first "fully fledged smart grid". Their energy utility, Xcel Energy, has installed 20,000+ smart meters that report all electricity usage in real time and they're starting to offer dynamic pricing plans that allow them to charge different rates depending on the time of day (peak vs off-peak hours).
3. Opportunities will be had in Analytics. With all these sensors getting deployed someone will need to gather all this data and analyze it so humans can make good decisions. That said, there will be a lot of growth for anyone that can provide data storage and analysis.
I recommend you pick up the article and take a look because it has the potential to affect all of us.
Monday, November 1, 2010
This week I sat through a lecture discussing the current state of the US auto industry, specifically GM. I am mainly restating what I heard in this lecture because I find it very interesting and I think that it should be discussed.
Many political pundits will tell you that with hindsight, the GM bailout was a good idea. After all, we gave the company breathing room to pay off some debts, renegotiate others, and most importantly we saved thousands of American manufacturing jobs and we can still say that “America Builds Things”! Now as GM prepares for one of the largest public stock offerings in history in which they plan to pay back the government for its investment we can start to ask, was this really a good idea?
Here’s a couple reasons why we might want to still be a little sceptical of the bailout frenzy. First of all let’s ask, what does GM still make? Primarily trucks that sit on large chassis and frames that tend to use lots of fuel. What’s most frightening about these trucks though is that many in Washington want to push through legislation to make these same exact vehicles illegal to drive on American roads by the year 2015 (find source). Therefore if that’s the case then we just bailed out a company whose main product will be illegal to sell in the US in under 5 years...interesting.
Another reason to be skeptical is to really look at the Chevy Volt, what some are saying will be the savior of the company. The Volt is still out of reach of many Americans at a price tag of $41K ($33K if Washington can implement the tax credit) and therefore still can’t compete with Toyota’s Prius at around $25K. And when you look at the overall product line of GM the Volt is still just a tiny sliver of their offering. I might even venture to say that the Volt was somewhat of a political maneuver to show Washington that they’re moving forward but they’re really still banking on the old way of doing business.
Again I’m not claiming this is exactly what will happen but it is something that should be discussed.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
From a marketer's standpoint I think it has some interesting possibilities, namely it could enable marketers to advertise to people in the immediate area which could be great for a small businesses like restaurants. When you "Check-in" you can see "Specials Nearby" which usually pops up some Starbucks ad but once it catches on I hope to see more local-based advertisers.
One other feature I like is the "Nearby Tips" which opens recommendations for nearby places similar to a Yelp-type app.
Here's another good blog post on location marketing and where it's headed: http://tinyurl.com/2elax6v
Monday, March 29, 2010
Now he is predicting yet another movement in the software in the software industry, this time having to do with the iPad and the activity of social networks like Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Have a read:
Thursday, March 25, 2010
I went on to tell him that we had recently "beefed up" our SEO/SEM capabilities (which we have, I wasn't just blowing smoke at him) and I am confident that we have a better solution for him which led him to ask, "Well who inside your organization is responsible for messaging this new capability to clients?" Interestingly enough, I didn't know, I'm not even sure what I told the client...I probably just fumbled over my words and sounded like an idiot.
I began thinking about this, who REALLY is responsible for messaging new functionality to clients? Is it the Account Manager who has regular contact with the client? Or maybe it's the sales person, after all he is responsible for generating more revenue from clients. Maybe I'm just trying to cover my --- but this scenario doesn't necessarily fit the salesman's job because the new features are not "revenue generating" features, they're just enhancements. Maybe it's the marketing department who puts together all newsletters and client notifications.
Either way, if your organization hasn't had this discussion then it's probably time to be proactive about messaging new features to your clients. It does absolutely nothing for your business if you're working hard developing all these new features but no one knows what you're doing! If that explains your organization then someone with a better message is ready to come in and take your business.
Competitors are out there!
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Recently I rationalized that I couldn't land a large sales deal simply because the potential client was using one of our competitors. I assumed they were happy and had no desire to switch. It wasn't until much later that I found out that the potential client was in fact unhappy with their current provider and I swept in and landed the deal. While this example has a happy ending, if I would not have negotiated myself out of the deal up front then we'd have landed the business MUCH sooner.
Have a read...